Microsoft Flight

I downloaded the recently released game from Microsoft called Flight. Not to be confused with the old Flight Simulator series they shut down after some 10 years of development and, I believe, sold off a few years ago (that may have not been an exclusive sale though).

Flight has been in development for a while now and is a reboot/re-imagining of the series. Unfortunately, they decide that being more game-like, instead of simulation-based, was required. Now the focus is on "missions" - like flying through rings that are way too close to boats or buildings or flying a passenger on a sight-seeing tour (at least that one is fairly realistic).

They've also decided that the game should be free, at first, but that you should have to have a account with their XBox focused "Microsoft Live" and have to buy "points" that you then exchange for add-ons like small bits of new scenery or a new aircraft. You get two slow aircraft out of the free download, each add-on one (there's only two at the moment) cost from $6-$10.

Getting nickel'd and dime'd is a big turn off for me, unfortunately. So is buying "points" like I'm getting tokens at Chuck E Cheese. Points feel like the entire idea is to scam you: no refunds so you always have surplus points that aren't enough to buy anything and the opportunity for a fluctuating "exchange" rate so that points can loose value overtime. Massive turn-off.

The game graphics are pretty enough, but no big leap over MS Flight Sim X, which is years old now.

One of the great things about MS Flight Sim was the third-party eco-system: various companies were built around providing add-ons for the old system, from detailed aircraft models to air-traffic systems, and new scenery.

I looked into a few of those companies to see if they had announcements for Flight, but one had moved on to more training-based applications (selling hardware and professional flight software) and another has apparently gone dormant as their site looks like it's stuck in 2002. I can't blame them, they would have had to either re-make themselves or move on to other jobs when MS abandoned them by killing Flight Sim.

Having now down-played the simulation aspect of a flight simulator feels like a bad move to me. Flight Sim already had the ability to be played like a "game", as far as having missions, etc. It feels like MS decided that Flight Sim wasn't making enough money and that the solution was to kill it, re-create it, and then not include the main feature of it - simulation. Not sure that was smart, but maybe they were more concerned about using Live to sell Points and felt they couldn't shoe-horn Live into the old application.

Who knows though - the seeds of a good simulator are in Flight, maybe they'll let those bloom again someday.

Comments

Paul Zaremba said…
Hi Jason,

I recommend that you check out "X Plane" by Laminar Research. I've switched over everything on my end to that, and am very impressed.

I will never give Microsoft another dime for any type of flight simulation product, given what they did to the dev team and the loyal customers.
January 28, 2013 at 2:21 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Updating data on the Garmin Perspective system

Image
After changing from the Avidyne system to the Cirrus Perspective (G1000) system, I had to relearn an important part of owning an airplane: how to update all the data the systems use. There's even more data in the Perspective, including AOPA directory data and more charts. In this walkthrough, I make use of the Jeppesen app for Apple OS X: JDM .  It has worked well for me, though I did need to call Jeppesen when I first set this up to get my subscriptions fixed up.  They gave great customer support when I did. The process starts (optionally) by hooking up a ground power unit (GPU).  In the case of the Cirrus, you can certainly do this without it, but I tend to hook it up just to be sure.  The systems draw about 8-10amps while updating, but you won't generally have the power on for long.  One tip I've read: power up the GPU before plugging it into the plane, at least for the one I bought.  That saves the plane from seeing any power spikes that might have occurred when t
Read more

G1000 transistion training - emergencies - final flight

Image
For the final flight in my G1000 transition course we focused on failure scenarios. Not the "engine goes POOF" kind but the avionics kind. Normal situation This picture shows what the 2 Garmin screens show in a normal (non failure) situation. You can see we have 2 screens - the left PFD focusing on flight performance (airspeed, heading, attitude, altitude) and the right screen (MFD) focusing on engine data, mapping, checklists, and everything else. Failed PFD screen In this scenario the screen that is right in front of you (the PFD) has failed. This basically means the screen has gone dark. We simulate that by dimming the screen down to 0% brightness. After darkening the PFD we shot a GPS approach into Rock Hill. When this failure has occured you shift the G1000 into Reversionary mode. That means the info that is normally split across 2 screens is now merged into 1. It actually duplicates the same data on both screens, but since the PFD screen is no longer functioning
Read more

A-10C Standby Compass - Sun Shade

Image
 One of the final items to add to this instrument build (besides the text covers for the lower LEDs) was the sun shade for the AR LED box.  I made this out of thin aluminum sheets , cutting it from a template using some metal sheers .    My template was created by tracing some of the actual artwork from the DCS sim, and then scaling it to the proper size. It turned out ok, not perfect but pretty good.  Primed and painted it and then installed it using 2 of the 4 holes that were already on the LED box 3D print.  I used some heat inserts in those holes to give the screws something to bite, but the holes are really too big for my inserts so had to use some glue to help out.  
Read more